Recommendations for Tuen Mun Landfill Expansion

Recommendations for Tuen Mun Landfill ExpansionMan Sum Yi, Annieurban Planning Principles and PracticesTo Principal Town plannerFrom Assistant Town Planner (MAN Sum Yi Annie)Subject Recommendation to Tuen Mun landfill intricacyLandfill is being regarded as bingle of the local anestheticly unsought land uses (LULUs) (Popper, 1981), and sitting of LULUs often causes heated regard among the society (Lai et al., 2007). According to the prediction made by the Legislative Council (2013), the westmost New Territories (WENT) landfill in Tuen Mun is expected to be exhausted in 2019. The quicken exhaustion of landfill in Hong Kong catches our attention, and this planning problem requires immediate response from the authorities and urban planners. Even though major opposition is held by Tuen Mun residents, the fate of WENT landfill expansion merchantmannot be denied, in the view of surging prodigality fill and the former(a) waste charge strategies be not ready yet. In this memo, the crux of the landfill expansion problem willing first be discussed, followed by recommended policy actions and justifications in gaining support to the plan.Crux of WENT landfill expansion problem remove location of landfills remains as a big challenge to planners. The pass of landfill expansion is particularly signifi raiset in Hong Kong because of limited land and high-pitched population density (Woo, 2010). Moreover, the common does not trust the administration in siting locally throwaway(prenominal) land uses (Lam Woo, 2009 Woo, 2010). There is a major predicament between environmental umpire and urgency in discussion waste. condescension the fact that the government is working on other waste management strategies, such as the getd waste charge, food waste recycling confederation scheme and the new incinerator (environmental shelter Department, 2014), landfill extension is still necessary to bring off the remaining 10,000 tonnes of waste which require disposa l every day (Legislative Council, 2013). Fuelled by increasing population and rapid economic development, the amount of waste lots is expected to surge continuously. Tuen Mun residents are concerned about the unfavorable impacts upset their living environment, which includes odors, health impacts, common hygiene, and the declining local image. Furthermore, Tuen Mun residents challenged the government decision that environmental nicety is infringed as Tuen Mun is currently home to many LULUs (Lam Woo, 2009). As discussed in the previous memo, domain perception, alternative policies and sustainability of landfills are the three main reasons hampering cosmos support towards the expansion plan. Therefore, in this memo, recommendations are made on the reason to gain human race acceptance.Recommended policy actionsAn open and participatory approach is recommended in that location are four recommended policy actions to increase public acceptance and gaining public trust. They in clude evaluating the expansion plan, minimizing disturbance to Tuen Mun residents, showing commitment and involving the public.First, planners scum bag pass judgment the whole expansion plan once again, in terms of outdistance from residents and the extended area. Planners bunghole examine the possibility of reducing the expansion area. A smaller expansion area will be more unobjectionable to residents, as their social tariff in handling waste will be smaller. 67.95% of interviewed Tuen Mun residents perceived the landfill expansion as a need for Hong Kong, go only 12.5% perceived it as a local need in a survey conducted (Lam Woo, 2009). The government hatful increase education and promotion, in order to allow the public to understand the urgency of the problem.Second, planners abide propose expressive styles to minimize nuisance brought to the residences in Tuen Mun. The design of garbage motortruck can be im fired and the leakage problem of waste irrigate should be st rictly controlled. Planting greenbelts around the expanded landfill is another suggestion, which can act as a separation between the landfill and local residents. Planners can explore the other ways in transporting waste, for example using sea transport, so that disturbance during waste transportation can be reduced. Streets can be cleaned more frequently within Tuen Mun hence pests and insects can be eliminated.Third, the government should show commitment to the public, demonstrate that they will shoulder the responsibility in waste management. The government can present a timeline in municipal waste diminution and set coherent term reduction goals. Tuen Mun residents expressed that the pollution problem arose from landfill extension was their top concern (Lam Woo, 2009). An blood quality monitoring station can be set up in Tuen Mun, monitoring the amount of toxic gases and the general air quality. This can increase the confidence of Tuen Mun residents towards the landfill exp ansion and better protect health of residents. terminal but not least, the government should be more sensitive to local concerns and engage public in the decision-making function. Rather than stipend strategies, greater public participation is more effective in persuading local residents (Lam Woo, 2009). Government can foster trust building by increasing transparency and extension time for the consultation period. The government should show respect to the views of different stakeholders. The government can adopt residents suggestions towards the expansion plan, and promote better communication with residents and the Tuen Mun regularise Council.Justifications to recommended actionsIndeed, achieving environmental justice is always easier said than done. The concept of environmental justice refers to the equal share of burden of responsibility (Levy, 2011) in handling waste. During the process of decision making, fair treatment and meaningful involvement of the public is being con sidered as elements of environmental justice. environmental injustice can be seen finished the concentration of costs and risks of LULUs on a particular population (Been, 1993). all(prenominal) district in Hong Kong has its own function, and functions of districts are determined by locational factors. Although most Tuen Mun residents call for the respect towards environmental justice, fair siting of LULUs among all districts is extremely backbreaking and impractical. Proper siting of landfill requires the consideration of environmental, technical and social factors, and the wind direction is specially primary(prenominal). In order to persuade residents to accept the expansion plan, the government should prove that Tuen Mun is a legitimate and reasonable choice, as well as minimizing impacts brought to residents.The last goal of the WENT landfill expansion is to achieve comprehensive planning, in which health, safety and public welfare are taken into consideration. Comprehens ive planning refers to the plan that can guide the development of the entire community in a long term (Levy, 2011). Evaluation of the extension plan and minimization of disturbance even out governments consideration of the affected residents. The above suggested policy actions are able to establish trust between the public and the government, as the views of Tuen Mun residents are being considered and taken into account. An open and participatory approach in handling LULUs is crucial, as the public is being involved. Compensation measure is not recommended because economic loss is not one of the concerns of the affected residents (Lam Woo, 2009). Moreover, the effectiveness of monetary compensation has been questioned (Jenkins-Smith Kunreuther, 2005).ConclusionThe urgency waste problem is less significant than other pollution problems since it does not directly affect daily lives of Hong Kong citizens. In profit to other waste management policies, the proposed WENT landfill expa nsion plan is the best way to handle municipal solid waste. The government and planners play the most important role in promoting this expansion plan. In response to the strong local opposition, four recommendations are made, which include evaluating the expansion plan, minimizing disturbance, showing commitment and involving the public. Environmental justice is in fact difficult to be achieved in reality, so planners should focus on ways to gain public acceptance trance formulating policy actions. The above suggested ways are feasible because views of Tuen Mun residents are taken into account and they are involved in the decision-making process. All in all, the government should be committed to execute other reduction goals while promoting the expansion plan, and the persuasiveness of the plan will be increased.ReferencesBooksLevy, John M. (2011). Contemporary urban Planning, ninth edition, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall.Jenkins-Smith, H.C. and Kunreuther, H. (2005). Mitigation and benefits measures as policy tools for siting potentially hazardous facilities determinants of effectiveness and appropriateness. In S.H. Lesbirel and D. Shaw, eds. Managing conflict in installment siting an international comparison. Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar, 6384.Journal articlesBeen, V. (1993). Whats fairness got to do with it? Environmental justice and the siting of locally undesirable land uses.Cornell L. Rev.,78, 1001.Lam, K.C. Woo, L.Y. (2009). Public perception of locally unwanted facilities in Hong Kong Implications for conflict resolution. Local Environment, 14(9), 851-869.Lai, P.W. et al. (2007). Siting and community response to locally unwanted land uses a literature review. Hong Kong Centre for Environmental Policy and preference Management, Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Popper, F.J. (1981). Sitting LULUs. Planning, Vol. 47, 4 pp.12-15.Woo, L. Y. (2010).Trust and public perception Insights for facility siti ng in Hong Kong(Order No. 3483306). Available from ProQuest Dissertations Theses AI. (902185449). Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/902185449?accountid=14548Website materialsEnvironmental Protection Department (2014). Food Waste Recycling Partnership Scheme. Retrieved from http//www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/waste/prob_solutions/owt_food.htmlLegislative Council (2013). Environmental Infrastructure Projects. The Legislative Council Panel on Environmental Affairs. CB(1)1079/12-13(01) Retrieved from http//www.legco.gov.hk/yr12-13/english/panels/ea/papers/ea0527cb1-1079-1-e.pdf