French Lietenants Woman :: essays papers

French Lietenants Woman Existentialism, a philosophy that emphasizes the uniqueness, isolation and freedom upon and undivided is a major(ip) theme in John Fowles, The French Lieutenants Woman. Is our liveness ordained by the superior, or do we power our future? In chapter 13, Fowles interrupts the narration and nones the innate aspects of writing as a novelist, the freedom of the characters that he has haved, and the time and structure o f the novel itself. Though unwieldy to incorporate the authors visions in their own literature, it is manipulated fiction, meta-fiction that is, which perhaps is a subject of major interest amongst the readers of The French Lieutenants Woman. At first, in chapter 13, it becomes evident that he himself, Fowles, is shot of his writings, I do not know he immediately confirms. By the third paragraph he has repeated the word perhaps louvre times, demonstrating Fowles puzzlement of whether he restrains his characters, or, they control him? F owles addresses on behalf of all novelists, and comments on the natural features of writing, that a novelist has no predetermined illustration from chapter one. Fowles also states, We wish to create worlds as real as, however other than the world that is(pg.81), which associates to how this novel is a classical Victorian one, but, from a a modern perception. Fowles tries to link the estimate of a modern perspective with existentialism, that it is no longer like the pre-ordained Victorians, but the concept that his characters are free from authority. Although Fowles aims to attaining a point of focus in chapter 13, he repeatedly, violently and offensively comments on God and faith. He sates, that he The novelist stands next to God, which is an scarce feature amongst people in general, the clue of equating yourself to God. Not only does Fowles reveal this, but following that he concludes He may not know all, yet he tries to profess that he does, which may well suggest als o God does not know all. This comparison is again evident, the novelist is still a God, since he creates (pg.82). In addition, Fowles does not understand that in much of his views, he is utterance on behalf of thousands of authors, which possibly will find his comments rather offending.