Human Rights as a Global Issue

humane beings Rights as a Global IssueThis essay get out aim to explain and describe mercifulkind mightys, how it was value and how it is rapidly meet a global issue in various countries. The essay give similarly go further to discuss Benthams theory relating to human rights and analyse the values of human rights with and without rightfulnesss to value them.Firstly, according to MM Wallace and Martin-Ortega human rights ar regarded as those central and inalienable rights essential for life as a human being.1 mankind rights be kn let to be the radical rights that belong to all and as such all one(a) is entitled to hand these rights. in that location fuck off been different ideas on human rights over past centuries thus far it received supranationalistic support as a result of the final solution and the Second World War. As a result of this, the United terra firma adopted the Universal Declaration of tender Rights in 1948 which sets out to protect human rights in various countries, to create aw atomic number 18ness to individuals, to serve as a benchmark, to educate individuals on their rights, to serve as a political tool. There atomic number 18 different bodies under the United Nations that manage the affairs of human rights and these ar the Human Rights committee, the Human rights commission which was replaced by the Human rights council. These bodies enforce and aim to maintain human rights equitys in different countries to a certain extent.There are three different human right justices which are enforced and monitored in different ways these are the international police, the regional right and the domestic honor. According to the oxford dictionary international law is a body of rules established by custom or accordance recognised by nations as binding in their relations with one another.2The international law protects human rights globally and it consists of treaties and conventions such as internationalist Convention on C ivil and Political Rights, the United Nations Convention on Rights of a Child and the United Nations Convention against Torture. Apart from international law, the regional law is alike utilise to protect rights and it consists of home-group treaties such as the European Convention on Human Rights, the Afri washbowl Charter on Human and Peoples Rights and the American Convention on Human rights. other than this, there is also domestic law that also serve the aforesaid(prenominal) purpose as the international and regional laws. Many countries have their own domestic human rights legislation which sets out to protect the rights of the citizens. For example, the United nation has the Human Rights Act 1998 which came into force on 2nd October 2000.Looking at the points made above, it is clear to see that these laws support and implement human rights. Human rights are essential further without the law they have no corpo original values. According to Benthams theory he states that n atural rights are dewy-eyed nonsensicality natural and imprescriptible right, rhetorical non find- nonsense upon stilts.3 Bentham was stating that natural rights are nonsense be bring he believes that rights are things that cannot be seen and if these so called rights cannot be seen then the mankind of them is actually un cognize. He also goes further to explain that human rights are given to individuals by the sovereign because it is the sovereign that makes the laws and therefore the laws should back up human rights, so in essence human rights have to cost with the law or without it, it is valueless. In addition to this, human rights need to have laws to guide them so as to avoid intrusion upon individuals rights by the brass which may lead to conflict and dispute which could at last escalate to war. Furthermore international law can protect rights by the use of international trade. In international trade there are sanctions that are given to some countries that violate th e human rights laws and these are known as trade embargos, tariffs and quotas. An embargo is the complete prohibition against importing foreign effectives into the landed estate while the tariffs are taxes that are placed on imported effectuals in a country. The quotas are limits on the amount of a particular good that should be imported into a country. The embargo is the most reciprocally used sanction for states that go against the law and it has proven to be effective to a certain extent. The embargos are imposed by the UN or the EU examples of countries that have been embargoed from the United States are North Korea, Syria, Cuba, Iran, Somalia, Sudan and Libya. Although one can see that law is reliablely needed to protect human rights but international law can be criticised. International law is ineffective and inefficient to a certain extent because there are relieve reports on the infringement on human rights in different countries. An example is North Korea where human rights are being abused this shows that even with the existence of international law and the United Nations some countries can ignore the laws since it is non-legal limitation and a good example of international law is the UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights). Apart from this, international law is difficult to enforce as a result of the non-legal bound factor and therefore this will prove a difficult line of work for the United Nations. Another demerit of international law is that some sanctions that are imposed on some countries do not affect them. The embargo which is a form of sanction does not affect some regnant countries because without trade these countries can still survive and grow with their resources.Human rights can also be valued without the implementation of the law Bentham explains that human rights are just ideas but nevertheless they are there and they are recognised by the United Nations. The knowledge of these rights has real values in the sense that t he citizens of a country can constrict the government into giving them their rights since they are aware of it. This act which can be viewed as climblion against the government can either be carried out by interest groups or pressure groups. The student room article explained that pressure groups are organized groups of people who come together, usually outside of the government, with a common cause with the intention of influencing government policy and public opinion.4 The statement above shows that pressure group are groups of individuals that come together to pursue a common interest in the society. Pressure group is essential in every democratic society because it represents and promotes the principle of freedom of livery and freedom of standoff inherent in democratic settings. Fagan states the expression of opinions and views is widely considered a fundamental attribute of individual freedom.5 Pressure groups adopt different methods to promote their interests and these are lobbying, campaign, strike, protest and boycott. One of the major benefits of pressure groups is that it promotes democratic principles of freedom of speech therefore allowing individuals to express their opinions. Apart from this, another benefit is that it promotes democratic principles of condemnation which indirectly checks the power of the government. However pressure groups have been known to be very destructive, especially during the period of direct action such as a protest and this can eventually lead to retrogression in the society. Not only can this happen but it can also lead to civil war whereby a considerable number of citizens will be killed. In addition to this, human rights that have no law to support them have its disadvantages. One of which is the fact that the government can still infringe on the citizens human rights even if they attempt to rebel against the government. An example of a country where such act can be seen is Syria in Syria a civil war has occurr ed because of the uprising against the regime of the death chair Bashar al- Assad in March 2011. The Syrian civil war is also a part of the Arab spring uprisings in the Middle East. The Arab spring can be said to be the media term for a revolutionary wave of tempestuous and non-violent demonstrations such as protest, riots and civil war in the Arab world. The Arab spring which is still a global issue in the modern world has also been able to prove that without law to protect human rights it has no real values.In conclusion, human rights have no real values without the law to protect it. Referring back to the points made, it can be seen that having the knowledge of these rights are not substantial because human rights abuse will still occur but if the law is implemented, human rights can still be protected to a certain limit showing that with law human rights have real values. 11 Wallace MM R. Martin- Ortega O, global LAW, 7TH EDITION, 2013, Sweet and Maxwell pg 2402 INTERNATIONA L LAW, www.oxforddictionaries.com accessed 19th February, 20143 George H. Smith, Jeremy Benthams attack on Natural rights, June 26 2012, www.libertarianism.org accessed eighteenth February, 20144 THE STUDENT ROOM, PRESSURE GROUP,www.thestudentroom.co.uk accessed 19th February, 20145 Fagan A, THE ATLAS OF HUMAN RIGHTS, Myriad editions, 2010, Earthscan Ltd, pg 40